Inclusion - from BEE to YEE

DA presidential candidate Mamphela Ramphele says South Africa deserves better than Black Economic Empowerment, even though it was a noble idea.  “In that greatness that is us, there are better ways of creating a more inclusive (economic) system,” she said.

Ramphele was speaking shortly after DA leader Helen Zille had announced that Ramphele would be the party’s presidential candidate for the 2014 general election.

Gwede Mntashe’s reaction to this announcement was a quintessential ANC one-liner about a “rent-a-black” strategy.  The ANC always plays the race card.  Pan-Africanism has perennially been divided between the inclusivists who are inclined to assimilation or “mainstreaming”, and the exclusivists who believe that Africa is only for Africans.  This is the underlying sentiment.

The debate rages whether BEE is really affirmative action, or whether affirmative action in favour of the huge majority is just benefiting an elite.  Yes, wealth is being transferred to blacks, but not to all blacks, and not fairly.  This is exacerbated by greed that manifests itself in both waste and corruption.

Youth Economic Empowerment

YEE is the order of the day in election year.  BEE is waning; youth power is waxing.  Age apartheid is a major issue in the 2014 elections, as unemployment has replaced AIDS as the primary social evil in this decade.   What good is freedom when you are unemployed for so long that you become unemployable?

Oliver Tambo said: “A nation that does not take care of its youth doesn’t have a future.  And doesn’t deserve one.”  Yet those with jobs in South Africa continue to get pay increases, while the number of school leavers grows every year – who have little hope of finding work.  Mo Ibrahim warned of a coming “tsunami of youth”.  Neither is government employing everybody the correct answer!

Where there should be sharing, there is protectionism.  Where there should be nurture, there is deprivation.  Nkruma said that Africa should not look to the East or to the West, but it should look ahead.  To the future.  Whereas South Africa still hasn’t gotten over its past.  Mamphela Ramphele calls it woundedness.  Government especially should stop blaming apartheid for its own lackluster performance.

Only from citizens healed of this malaise can come new attitudes like: “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”  This is the opposite of the African proverb that says “A goat eats where it is tethered”.  It is very spiritual.  It is conversion.  Matters like this are far too important for politicians or even judges; this is the work of priests and pastors.  To paraphrase the Rev. Martin Luther King:

We come to our nation's rulers to cash a check.

When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution,

they were signing a promissory note to which every South African was to fall heir.

This note was a promise that all women and men

Yes, young as well as old

would be guaranteed paying work and sufficiency.

It is obvious today that the nation has defaulted on this promissory note

insofar as so many of her citizens are unemployed.

Instead of honoring this sacred obligation,

South Africa has given its youth a bad check,

a check that has come back marked "insufficient funds."

But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt.

We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults

of resources and opportunity in this nation.

And so we've come to cash this check,

a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and security of justice.

We have also come to this hallowed indaba to remind South Africa of the fierce urgency

This is no time to engage in the luxury of fat-cat salaries

or to take the tranquilizing drug of patronage

Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy.

Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of corruption

to the sunlit path of honesty and transparency

Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of malpractice

to the solid rock of integrity

Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children.

Power to the Young People

You have heard of people power, gender power, black power and now this.

Africa is relatively progressive in gender terms:

• In Asia, 88% of parliamentarians are men and 12% are women
• In North America, 79% of parliamentarians are men and 21% are women
• In Africa, 76% of parliamentarians are men and 24% are women
• In South Africa, 71% of parliamentarians are men and 29% are women

South Africa is leading in this respect, but there is not yet full gender balance.

The 2013 MDG Report says: Among 22 of the 48 countries where elections were held in 2012, the use of either legislated or voluntary quotas (usually in combination with a proportional representation system) were largely responsible for the above-average increase in the number of women members of parliament. Where quotas have been legislated, women took 24 per cent of parliamentary seats; with voluntary quotas, they occupied 22 per cent of seats. Where no quotas were used, women took just 12 per cent of seats, well below the global average.

The Quota System

In a Democracy, everyone is supposed to be represented, to have a voice.  Of course minors (under the age of 18) don’t vote, so they are supposedly represented by their elders.  But what do you do when two-thirds of the population is under age 35?

In C4L programming, we found that the best counselors for orphans and vulnerable children are not pastors or teachers, who are older, but peers.  We deployed 18 – 28 year olds to care and support 8 – 18 year olds in extra-curricular Kids Clubs.  This only made sense because of the age proximity.

What about parliament?  Here are some United Nations statistics

• World-wide, 6% of the parliamentarians are under 35
• In Africa, 11% of the parliamentarians are under 35

Once again Africa is relatively progressive, but still way short of equity.  Why not introduce a quota system for age representivity?

The 2013 MDG Report also says:  The gender gap in employment persists, with a 24.8 percentage point difference between men and women in the employment-to-population ratio in 2012. The gap is most acute in Northern Africa, Southern Asia and Western Asia, where women are far less likely to be employed than their male counterparts. The differences in the employment-to-population ratio between men and women in these three regions approached 50 percentage points in 2012.

Young people have borne the brunt of the crisis.  Negative labour market trends for youth accounted for 41 per cent of the decline in the global employment-to-population ratio since 2007, due to rising unemployment and falling participation.

It is a well-known fact that the rate of youth unemployment is much higher than the overall unemployment rate.  In South Africa, 75% of the ranks of the jobless are under 35.  Yet they do not themselves have a proportionate voice in Parliament.  Not yet.

Youth Power

The ANC Youth League was once considered to be the way the voice of Youth was heard.  Under senior pastor Zuma you had a youth pastor named Malema.  Whether it was a good configuration or not, it is functionally useless for the 2014 elections.

So who speaks for the Youth?  Who will the under-35s vote for?  If two-thirds of the population is under 35 and those under 18 cannot vote – do the math!  About half of the electorate in 2014 is between 18 and 35.  (Given that the average life expectancy is in the low 50s.)  That’s about the same as the gender baseline – half/half!

The DA has now merged with Agang, with Mamphela Ramphele as its candidate for president.  But guess what?  She is 67 years old.  A woman yes, but she is going to pull the average age of Parliament up, not down!  She is 5 years older than Helen Zille and Patricia de Lille, who are both 62.  It’s reminiscent of Chernenko taking over from Andropov!

The only youth-led party out there is the EFF (Economic Freedom Fighters).  They are led by Julius Malema who is 33 years old.  That’s the same age that Thomas Sankara was when he became President of then-Upper Volta.  He changed his country’s name to Burkina Faso.  In both the major languages there, that means “Land of Upright Men.”  What would it take to make South Africa fit that description, instead of broken promises, waste and graft?

Sankara followed the formula that we need in 2014 – conservative in terms of the rule of law and liberal in terms of economic freedom.  Thus he was both right and left at the same time.  He reigned in on waste and corruption.  Usually that is best done by dictators, remembering that before Solon’s experiment with Democracy in ancient Athens, there had already been a millennium of prosperity.  In other words, you don’t need to vote to prosper – you just need safe and secure conditions for business and trade.  Sankara was tough on waste and corruption.  For both bleed away resources that are needed to help the poor.

Then he also made many radical pro-poor changes.  For example, in the capital city, Sankara converted the army's provisioning store into a state-owned supermarket open to everyone (the first supermarket in the country).  Innovation.  He redistributed land from the feudal landlords to the peasants. Wheat production increased from 1700 kg per hectare to 3800 kg per hectare. Equal opportunity.  His government banned female genital mutilation, forced marriages and polygamy; while appointing females to high governmental positions and encouraging them to work outside the home and stay in school even if pregnant.  Gender… and youth rights.

Albert Einstein said:  "The world will not evolve past its current state of crisis by using the same thinking that created the situation".  We need more young people in Parliament, to think out of the box.  We need to drive “humble cars” and end an era of “unfettered capitalism”.

The Bible and the Almanac

We lament the departure of this great artist and human being yesterday.

When Seeger wrote If I had a hammer in 1949, Bono was but a twinkle in his father's eye.  But that song has become like our International anthem.

I wrote the tribute below in 2007 - to my own father on the occasion of his winning of the Order of Canada for humanitarian service.  It was never before posted as a C4L Bulletin, so this is not a re-run.  All I can say is this gives you some idea of the stature of Pete Seeger - the yardstick against which I measure greatness.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Bible and the Almanac

In the 1940s, two musical groups were formed which would have a great influence on my life.  One was called the Med's Gospel Team, in Canada, because the members were all studying medicine.  One of the team members would later get married and become my father.  The other was called the Almanac Singers, in the USA, which included Pete Seeger and Woodie Guthrie.  Obviously the emphasis of these groups differed – one was evangelistic and the other was social/cultural.  The better known group (by far) had chosen its name out of its belief that most farm homes had two books – a Bible and an almanac.

Maybe this explains why my two favorite forms of music are hymns and protest songs?  I love to hear my father playing hymns on the piano, and I still agree with Pete Seeger's comment at the 1965 Newport Folk Festival – when he said he wished that he had an axe to cut the cord of Bob Dylan's microphone!  This because Dylan had just been accompanied by the Paul Butterfield Blues Band, and no one could hear the message in his music.

As a young man, Pete Seeger embraced the conviction that songs are a way of binding people to a cause.  John and Charles Wesley were the minister and the musician that launched Methodism.  Seeger's father - a music academic - wrote that the necessary question to ask was not “Is it good music?” but “What is the music good for?”

Pete Seeger's influence is amazing.  Dylan was not just Seeger's heir apparent, perhaps more of his legitimization.  Johnny Cash was but a teen idol until he re-recorded his song Folsom Prison Blues in a new setting – not in a concert hall or recording studio, but live at Folsom Prison.  Songs like Man in Black, that influenced me personally, put deeper meaning in the music and that placed Cash (the other JC in my life) in a whole new league.  He in turn influenced others - like Bono, who in the Cash tradition usually dresses in black.  And Bruce Springsteen, who was asked to record a tribute album to Seeger in 1997.  In the end, he recorded but did not include the song that has surely influenced my life more than any other... it just asserted itself too forcefully among the others in his collection:

            It's the hammer of justice

            It's the bell of freedom

            It's the song about the love between my brothers and my sisters

            All over this land

No wonder Bono would be named Man of the Year by TIME magazine, for following Seeger's lyrical advice - and example.  I have certainly tried to live my life in alignment to these lyrics.  Recently, Seeger was introduced at a “pro bono” school concert with these words: “He's probably the person who's done more for this country than anyone I can think of.”

You need both spirituality and activism – Bible and almanac.  Upon graduation from medical school, the members of the Med's Gospel Team all became medical missionaries.  They headed for three continents - into Ecuador, Zambia and China.  However, en route to China my father stopped in Europe to study tropical medicine.  During that year (1949) the Bamboo Curtain came down and missionaries were no longer able to enter.  So he diverted to the Belgian Congo, where I was born.

The principle that both groups shared is that all human beings are created equal.  In the mid-20^th century, this meant either you could either become a missionary or a socialist – Bible or almanac, I suppose.  The medical missionaries exerted huge influence in remote parts of the Third World.  Meanwhile, Seeger got called up before Congress's Un-American Activities Committee.  For pleading the First Amendment (not the Fifth) he was indicted for contempt of Congress, but this was later overturned by an appeals court.  Advocacy is seen by many as a higher calling than service provision, but it often comes at a cost in terms of your reputation.  But having a bad reputation does not always mean that you lose your influence.  Medical missionaries in countries that joined the Second World (communist bloc) often lost their reputation when they were called reactionaries, but this seldom diminished their influence.

Here is a story recorded by Alec Wilkinson in the New Yorker (April 17, 2006).  It is told by a man named John Cronin, who is the director of the Pace Academy for the Environment, at Pace University.  Cronin has known Seeger for thirty years.  “About two winters ago, on Route 9 outside Beacon, one winter day, it was freezing – rainy and slushy, a miserable winter day – the war in Iraq is just heating up and the country's in a poor mood,” Cronin said.  “I'm driving north, and on the other side of the road, I see from the back a tall, slim figure in a hood and coat.  I'm looking, and I can tell it's Pete.  He's standing there all by himself, and he's holding up a big piece of cardboard that clearly has something written on it.  Cars and trucks are going by him.  He's getting wet.  He's holding the homemade sign above his head – he's very tall, and his chin is raised the way he does when he sings – and he's turning the sign in a semi-circle, so that the drivers can see it as they pass, and some people are honking and waving at him, and some people are giving him the finger.  He's eighty-four years old.  I know he's got some purpose, of course, but I don't know what it is.  What struck me is that, whatever his intentions are, and obviously he wants people to notice what he's doing, he wants to make an impression – anyway, whatever they are, he doesn't call the newspapers and say, “I'm Pete Seeger, here's what I'm going to do.”  He doesn't cultivate publicity.  That isn't what he does.  He's far more modest than that.  He would never make a fuss.  He's just standing out there in the cold and the sleet like a scarecrow.  I go a little bit down the road, so that I can turn and come back, and when I get him in view again, this solitary and elderly figure, I see that what he's written on the sign is Peace.”

Advocacy is legitimized by social activism.  It is important to be out there, doing your part, not just speaking on talk shows and stuff.  Which brings me to the purpose of writing these reflections.  My father is almost as old as Pete Seeger, and he is still an activist too.  Already in 2007 he has spent two months overseas, helping out his favorite cause.  It was good to observe him back in a position of influence – helping to bring about intellectual and attitudinal change...

But best of all, for a career that has included both overseas and domestic health service, and for his example of serving others through faith-based organizations, he was awarded the Order of Canada this month.  This is the highest civilian honor that can be bestowed on a citizen, and he deserves it.

This month also, TIME magazine released its annual issue containing the 100 most influential people in the world.  I was wondering how many of those listed will have the staying power of these two personal heroes of mine - one who taught me to revere the Bible, and the other who wrote protest songs for the Almanac Singers?  To love my neighbor, and to hammer out injustice.  If only two of the 100 can do so, the world will be a better place for our grandchildren.

Tired of Waiting

A graphic Oxfam press release this week pointed out that the world’s richest people could fit on a bus.  Those riding on that single bus would have the same wealth as the poorest 50% of the world’s population.  One wonders if that was the bus from the airport to the conference centre in Davos?  When the rich elite gets together in Davos, can you really expect the theme of this year’s forum – Inequality – to change?

A message from Pope Francis I was sent to Davos.  It articulated this plea: I ask you to ensure that humanity is served by wealth and not ruled by it.  This C4L bulletin echoes that plea, not just for Davos but for all readers who come from a privileged background.

Vested interests make it harder to redistribute wealth as it gets more concentrated.  Finance Minister Gordan is quoted as saying, at Davos, “The world won’t suddenly become disconnected from itself”.  He was speaking about whether the challenges in emerging markets would shake investor confidence.  But that is over-exuberance.  Surely the same motivation could be given for more radical change?  The National Development Plan is almost triumphalist when you read the article in today’s Sunday Times by suspended Cosatu leader Zwelinzima Vavi: What has happened to the decade of the working class?

• The first decade of our democracy disproportionately benefited white business relative to the working class
• Inequality has increased, levels of poverty remain high despite the increase in social grants, and more people than before live on less than R524 a month ($50)
• Piecemeal solutions to a systematic crisis rooted in colonial dispossession and capitalist exploitation will not work
• We are told that employment is bigger than ever before.  This is an attempt to pull wool over the eyes of the working class.  Yes, employment numbers are at their highest, but the context is that, in 1994, we had a population of 40 million.  Today, it is 53 million.  Overall, the unemployment rate in 1995 was 31%, but today it is 36%
• Youth unemployment in South Africa is the second highest in the world

Are “radical” and “leftist” synonymous?

Vavi goes on: “The 11^th congress of the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) took radical decisions to give practical meaning to the call that we should now embrace radical economic transformation… Cosatu has not been able to implement its resolutions.”

Levels of frustration are so high that some Cosatu members are already distancing themselves from the ruling alliance.  Just today, a conference was convened by the rebel Unions (led by Numsa) to kick-start a united front against Neoliberalism.

This calls for a footnote about terminology, because C4L bulletins are also sent to readers in North America.  For some reason that I have never figured out, what is called Neoliberalism in Africa is called Conservativism in America.  Think Ronald Reagan and Maggie Thatcher.  This digression is important to grasp.  I am indebted to Professor Sampie Terreblanche for explaining it in his 2012 book Lost in Transformation.  Basically, it was Reagan and Thatcher who overpowered “the second world”… Gorbachev conceded, and withdrew not only from Eastern Europe but from the overseas “flashpoints” as well.  South Africa was one of these, so when Gorbachev told the ANC that it could no longer count on Soviet support for its armed resistance, it had no choice but to seek a negotiated settlement.  At the same time, the Americans exerted pressure on the apartheid regime to negotiate.

Of course averting civil war and reaching a non-violent rapprochement was tricky.  But in the New World Order that emerged, with one superpower, the ANC capitulated in terms of its economic path (called GEAR in its fullest manifestation).  Cosatu was in its infancy at the time, but has come to recognize the consequences of this “wrong turn”.

However, Cosatu is a member organization, part of “organized Labour”.  So while it is a force to be reckoned with - even now that it is “of two minds” internally – it is leftist.

Unemployed Youth

Unions represent their members, who pay dues to fund them.  So they do not represent the interests of non-members.  If you are an unemployed youth, Cosatu does not represent you.

Historically, the best interests of youth were articulated by the ANC Youth League.  But when this group raised its voice about the “wrong turn” outlined above, the old guard in the ANC muzzled it.  The end result is that the ANCYL is going under.  It is basically out for the count in terms of the upcoming elections.

The expelled Youth League leader thus formed his own new party called the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).  Its seven pillars tackle Neoliberalism as well.  But not really from a leftist position, as it just represents the half of the population that has not yet felt tangible benefits from Democracy.  Twenty years ago, at the dawn of Democracy, only 20% of the population were well off, mainly whites.  Twenty years later, another 30% have benefited, forming a black middle class.  (A lot of whites have emigrated, so the upper class of 20% is now both black and white.)  But 50% of the population remains without improvement.  This is what Davos means by “inequality”.  So the EFF can be radical without being leftist.

Needless to say, youth are among those whose prospects are grim.  They can’t remember Reagan or Thatcher, as many of them are “born frees”.  Who represents them?  In South Africa, the term “youth” goes up to age 35.  Two-thirds of the population is now in that age bracket, but neither the ANC nor a radicalized Cosatu have youth’s best interest at heart.

I have written another whole bulletin (You are only a boy) about David and Goliath.  The youngest brother goes up to the front lines of battle to deliver some cheese from the farm.  He hears that a giant has caused military gridlock.  Undaunted, he offers to fight the champion of the Philistines.  His brothers laugh at him, but he insists.  King Saul offers him his own armour, but David declines it.  He goes out to meet the giant with his own unconventional weapon, and slays him.  This was completely unexpected and perplexing to the old guard.

Before long, the king gets so jealous that he runs David into hiding as an outlaw.  But the pimpernel becomes a lighting rod for discontent.  He forms a coalition of the wounded.  In due course, he becomes King David father of Solomon and ancestor of Jesus.  The song that made King Saul so insanely jealous can be paraphrased as:

Zuma has won his thousands

But Malema will win his tens of thousands

Pan Africanism

We named different buildings at C4L after people.  For example, our Mentor Centre is named after Charlotte Macheke, the first African women to earn a university degree.  The main building on campus is named after Tiyo Soga, the first ordained priest in South Africa – he became a Presbyterian minister in 1856.  A Xhosa, he studied in Scotland, married a local lass there, and they came back to South Africa as missionaries in 1857.  Needless to say, he was not always accepted by fellow clergy - just as she had challenges adjusting.

Charles Darwin published his On the Origin of Species in 1859.  The influence of “social Darwinism” spread fast, being broadly accepted as fact by the 1870s.  A fellow missionary of Tiyo Soga’s – named John Aitken Chalmers – predicted that Africans were doomed to become extinct.  Social Darwinism gave rise to this kind of thinking, like the concept of a super race that drove the Third Reich only a few decades later.  Chalmers was upset that Africans were not converting to Christianity, thus his backlash.

Writing in the May 11^th edition of the King William’s Town Gazette, Tiyo Soga dismissed the assertion that only a Eurocentric outlook would secure perpetuity for blacks.  He pointed to references even in the Bible of blacks and thus to their resilience: “I find the Negro from the days of the old Assyrians downwards keeping his individuality and distinctiveness amid the wreck of empires, and the revolution of ages.  I find him opposed by nation after nation.  I find him enslaved – exposed to all the vices and the brandy of the white man.  I find him in this condition for many a day – in the West Indian Islands, in Northern and Southern America and in the South American Colonies of Spain and Portugal.  I find him exposed to all these disasters and yet living – multiplying and never extinct.”

This heralded the dawn of an awareness that would later be called Pan Africanism.

The Pan African Movement

The movement was formalized in London in 1900.  An American sociologist attending that indaba was WEB du Bois.  His concern at this inaugural meeting was: “The problem of the 20^th century is the problem of the colour line, the question as to how far differences of race – which show themselves chiefly in the colour of the skin and the texture of the hair – will hereafter be made the basis of denying to over half the world the right of sharing to their utmost ability the opportunities and privileges of modern civilization.”

So the movement began with the intent to secure equal rights for black people where ever they were all over the world. 

But in 1915, a Jamaican called Marcus Garvey challenged du Bois.  Whereas du Bois was an assimilationist, trying to secure equal rights so that blacks could integrate into any setting, Garvey was an exclusivist, who believed that different races could not be reconciled.  While du Bois championed full civil rights in America for blacks, Garvey promoted a return to the motherland – “Africa for Africans”.

One way or the other, the Pan African movement’s focus for its first half century was on the diaspora.  But that changed with the emergence of independent African states in the aftermath of World War II.  Ghana was the first nation to gain its independence and Kwame Nkruma hosted a Pan African congress – in Africa for the first time – in 1958.  Its focus shifted to helping African nations to emerge.  This came to pass, and later congresses were held in Tanzania in 1973 and Uganda in 1994 – and in January 2014 in South Africa.

In the African setting, these two strategies are not unfamiliar.  For example, in the former Portuguese colonies, blacks could become full citizens or “assimilados” if they learned to speak Portuguese, studied the colonial curriculum, dressed in European clothes, etc.  The dark shadow cast by this approach was that local culture was of absolutely no value.

Then there was segregation or as it was called in its most Vorwoerdian form – apartheid.  In this approach, there was space for both – but apart.  The “Africa for Africans” slogan took on a more sinister anti-white sense – exacerbating racial tensions.  Implicit in this approach is that each and every culture has some value, but some are worth more than others.  This has been called “open racism” in comparison to assimilation which is called “closed racism”.

Black Supermacy or Black Consciousness?

Malcolm X is an African American folk hero.  He is to America what Steve Biko is to South Africa – the best known voice among black thinkers.  Like Biko, his personal views evolved.  They had some roots in the teachings of his father – an exclusivist - who believed that black Americans should all migrate back to Africa, being unwelcome in America almost a century after its civil war.  The influence of Elijah Mohamed shaped his views, until his own penetrating insights began to see through the charades of the Nation of Islam, that had brought him from prison to the status of national spokesman for black supremacy.  This group taught that blacks should first and foremost come to terms with their own identity and shake off the “colonization of the mind” that kept them enslaved to white agendas - long after slavery was abolished.  So it refused to cooperate with whites, or even with other civil rights groups that promoted integration with whites.  It was fiercely proud and isolationist.

As Malcolm X began to perceive the Nation of Islam's imperfections, he started to open up to collaboration with other civil rights groups.  This was anathema to his long-time sponsors.  Seeing it as betrayal, they assassinated him. Thus, African Americans sorted out their own differences without the help of the whites in authority.  While this was part of their defiance, the use of such violence emptied black supremacy of authenticity.  This was not a case of white supremacists beating up blacks - like the case of Steve Biko.  It was self-destruction.

One has to bear in mind that blacks in the diaspora are a minority, whereas they are the vast majority in Africa, even in South Africa which still has a significant white population.

 

• Every time a black is called a “coconut” in South Africa, it illuminates a paranoia that infers that the opposite to white supremacy is black supremacy.  It is not.
• Even though there is a huge difference between black supremacy and affirmative action, this can get confused at times; this is often described as Triumphalism
• It is inconsistent to be happy that Barrack Obama is the most powerful man in the world and yet wish that you could exclude whites from your own African work place
• Affirmative action in favour of the majority is, in a word, odd
• 150 years after Tiyo Soga married the intrepid Janet, mixed marriages are still very rare in South Africa.  This primary human relationship should become a future focus of Pan Africanism.  If you cannot figure it out at family level, how on earth can you win at work place level or in political arena?

Well Done, Good and Faithful Servant

In my recollection, only the funeral of John Kennedy in 1963 would match the drama and significance of Nelson Mandela's funeral today.  It was very moving.

The service ended with a sermon by the Methodist bishop.  He read from Matthew 25, those familiar words of affirmation to the top performers in the Parable of the Talents.  Then he surprised me...

He likened Mandela to the third servant, who buried his talent, refusing - in defiance - to play along with a top-down system in which an absent landlord can still dictate the rules of play to obliging servants.

He critiqued the servants with even more talents than Mandela started with for playing along with the status quo, in a performance-based role that never questions the way the Paradigm works.  A system that rewards the rich and oppresses the poor, where to those who have, more is given - taken from those who don't have...

It was quite a new look for me at a familiar passage.  He started to sound a bit like Pope Francis!

His interpretation had some answers for me, as I have recently struggled with this conundrum... that the rising ranks of youth cannot break into a job market that is shrinking, so that those with jobs are hanging on tight to them.  Those with jobs are getting pay increases, while the demography of the unemployed is getting younger and the unemployed are gradually becoming unemployable.

Who is the good and faithful servant in that scenario?!

The Bishop's take on this Parable is that those who resist the system - like the Occupy Movement - are on the right track.  He was one of several speakers who made pointed remarks about how Corruption is one way that those with more talents than others leverage their increase, fatalistically saying that this is how the system works...

A strong message of encouragement came through to me personally. 


I have to admit to laughing out loud when Kenneth Kaunda spoke, and to shedding tears when Ahmed Kathrada spoke.  He is one of the few remaining Treason Trialists, among those who spent decades on Robben Island with Madiba.  Near the end of his tribute, he said "When Walter died, I lost a father.  This week I have lost a brother.  Now, I don't know where to turn to..."  You could hear his voice quivering with sincerity, it was not just rhetoric.  Eish!

There is also some good humour coming out of this week.  Traditionally, the big ANC adversary has been the Boer... but that controversial Struggle song has now been parodied as "Kill the booer"!   One commentator said wryly that this week we are not just saying goodbye to one President, but two...


As an individual, I can say that all the hype has certainly helped ME process a sense of loss and sorrow.  It has been a week of drama and reflection.  Those who have prepared all the media material and event logistics deserve to hear that phrase: "Well done, good and faithful servants".  Except, of course, those like the psycho-signing-interpreter at the stadium memorial, who are reaping where they did not sow...

Thanks to all of you as well for your prayers.

A Nation Taking Care of Its Youth

This photo has been haunting me of late.  I used it last year in a C4L Bulletin called Job and the Jobless.

The speaker in our church last Sunday said that Prayer is mentioned 500 times in the Bible, but that Wealth is mentioned 2,350 times.  That sort of stuck with me like statistics sometimes do.  They niggle at me.  The Bible has a lot to say about Wealth and what it is for.


 

I am contemplating hard times.  The last few years have been hard on me, because they have been hard on the people that I serve.  This week's news is that 25 000 more jobs were lost in the second quarter of this year, in South Africa.  Of those, 13 000 were in the "community and social sector".  This sector is bleeding and C4L is feeling its pain.

Economies shrink.  Droughts come unpredictably.  Businesses close.  People move on.  But imagine a Chamber of Commerce putting up a sign asking the jobless to "keep going".  This really gets to me.  Too close for comfort.

I keep pressing the case for promoting self-employment as opposed to government interventions to revive sectors that are shrinking.  But I am a voice crying in the veld.

Thanks for your prayers.  One encouraging note in my day today was being approached by a deep township high school asking if I would be the Motivational Speaker at its Matric Dance.  What an honour!

But what am I gonna say to young learners facing their final exams next month?  What can inspire them to work hard and do their best?  Certainly not the conditions that they will face in December was they leave that school for the last time, and enter the work force.

Oliver Tambo said that "a nation that does not take care of its youth has no future and does not deserve one".

Pray for me as I try to motivate learners when their future is bleak.